Working File 3

PURPOSE: To submit documentation for site plan control application.

Refer to revision notes to links to review versions.

Checklist

ARCHITECTURAL

  • 2026-01-07

    <DOCUMENT>

During this revision, we must focus on the design of the parking/pick up drop off areas. Architectural Plans need some more details, such as ramp details, but we have included the lift space and universal washroom.

REVISION NOTES

  • 2026-01-07

    <DOCUMENT>

  • City Remarks - Building Code Review

    <DOCUMENT>

w/ notes

w/o notes

SITE PLAN

For this revision, we will need to rework parking and incorporate a pick up/drop off zone. Consider accessibility needs here, EAF grants.

REVISION NOTES

  • 2026-01-07

    DOCUMENT

Need to verify requirements for lot consolidation

How does this impact site lines - expropriation?

  • 26/01/12

    Update to Lot Consolidation <SITE CONTEXT>

    Site <SKETCH> added to show consolidation approach city wants us to take.

  • 26/01/13

    Site plan <SKETCH> added to Lot Consolidation <SITE CONTEXT>

    Site plan showing Carp Rd Widening / expropriation

  • 26-01-13

    (Amanda/Veronica)

    Discussed lot consolidation, Carp road widening and expropriation.

    Approval for a holding tank still undetermined - this also links to project timeline for planning with the city (ie, will we spend another year trying to coordinate with the widening plan, maybe more?) I don’t think this site will work with a septic, and while we could obtain studies, it may not be worth while. I think the city wants (needs) us to consolidate. A pump and dump agreement - maybe?

    Without consolidating lots, we can either have parking or a pick/up drop drive through. New by-law vs old by-law. The change from minimum to maximum parking spaces calls to question the number of parking spaces. 8 could technically pass. What if we did not have access to other lot? I struggle with the notion of giving up a personal asset for that.

    Consolidating sites for parking represents a missed opportunity to align with the city’s Growth Management Targets. This project needs to take aim at maximizing number of daycare seats to service expanding communities. This means expanding the scope of the development, we need to accomplish a fair return on this investment. 2 daycares, one site - that’s the only was I can perceive this

    If we get permission from planning for a holding tank, we need to be resistant in consolidating lots. But we also want to be agreeable to motivate a “partner with planning” approach to “funding-based expropriation." :) It is worth waiting this project out if we can motivate the other city department (CWELCC) to understand the need for this community development. To do that, we need to look at everything again, step back, re-assess, re-evaluate and re-strategize. We need to add more building to make it worth our time.

    Legal representation is needed (if we consolidate) and recommended in review of the expropriation process. It is in your best interest at this point to protect your asset.

How will our pick/up drop off relate to intersections?

SEPTIC

  • 2026-01-07

    <DOCUMENT>

  • Item description

During this revision, we need to establish site servicing.

REVISION NOTES

  • 2026-01-07

    (DOCUMENT)

  • City Remarks - Building Code Review

    DOCUMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT

  • 2026-01-12

    Traffic Impact Assessment Screening Form

    <DOCUMENT>

Waiting on city remarks, traffic impact required

REVISION NOTES

STRUCTURAL

  • 2026-01-07

    DOCUMENT

Final Structural drawings will not be required for this submission for Site Plan control. We need to review the recent architectural revisions, especially for the lift, we can begin this secondary to the site planning to prepare for building permit application.

REVISION NOTES

  • 2026-01-07

    (DOCUMENT)

  • <DOCUMENT>

    STRUCTURAL:

    • Item 31

    Size building increase changes structural review scope. Structural review to also consider mechanical lift.

  • Item description

TRUSS AND JOIST

  • 2026-01-12

    layouts require final revisions

    <DOCUMENT>

Revised layouts are not required for site plan control application but are needed for building permit resubmission.

REVISION NOTES

GEOTECHNICAL

  • 2026-01-07

    DOCUMENT

GENERAL REVIEW

  • 2026-01-07

    DOCUMENT